A person in business attire is sat in a dark office, using two computer screens to review market and trading data. On the wall in front of them is a large LED screen showing more trading and market information.

JPMorgan Chase hit with almost $350 million in fines for gaps in trade surveillance data

With JPMorgan Chase being fined a considerable $350 million sum for “unsafe or unsound” practices around trade surveillance, what impacts will this have on how firms trade and communicate compliantly?

21 March 2024 2 mins read
By Jay Hampshire
Written by humans

Written by a human

In brief:

  • JPMorgan Chase has been fined nearly $350 million for deficiencies in its trade surveillance data capture procedures
  • The action, jointly taken by the OCC and Federal Reserve Board, also includes stipulations for the firm to undertake a comprehensive third-party review of policies
  • The size of the fine, combined with its intersection with previous cases of failures to capture comprehensive data, may indicate this is the next area of regulatory focus

It has been just over six months since the last substantial regulatory action sent shockwaves through the financial space, so the recent news of a near $350 million fine levied against JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve Board may feel like history repeating for those in the industry.

But whereas the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s $289 million action was taken against 11 Wall Street firms for recordkeeping failures around off-channel communications, the OCC and Federal Reserve Board’s fine was levied solely against JPMC – and for something that might prove to be the next area of regulatory focus.

From trading data sets to capture communications data and records of potential non-financial misconduct incidents – regulators are increasingly expecting firms to be able to supply complete datasets across a variety of areas. Ensuring that data is captured completely, stored securely, and can be surveilled for signs of risk are becoming must have capabilities to stay on the right side of regulators.